Media Fix
Press Censorship: How the Truth Was Hidden About Nagasaki
Nagasaki, which lost over 70,000 civilians (and a few military personnel) to a new weapon sixty-five years ago today, has always been The Forgotten A-Bomb City. No one ever wrote a bestselling book called Nagasaki, or made a film titled Nagasaki, Mon Amour. Yet in some ways, Nagasaki is the modern A-bomb city. For one thing, when the plutonium bomb exploded above Nagasaki it made the uranium-type bomb dropped on Hiroshima obsolete. In fact, if it had not exploded off-target the death toll in the city would have easily topped the Hiroshima total.
Hiroshima
has always drawn the vast majority of press, public and historical interest,
even though many who support the first atomic bombing have expressed severe
misgivings about number two because of the failure of United States to give the
Japanese at least a few more days to consider surrender after the first blast
(and the Soviets' declaration of war). Kurt Vonnegut Jr. once said in an
interview that the "nastiest act by this country, after human slavery, was the
bombing of Nagasaki."
But Nagasaki was "forgotten" from the very start, thanks to a blatant act of press censorship.
One of the great mysteries of the nuclear age was solved just five years ago: What was in the censored, and then lost to the ages, newspaper articles filed by the first reporter to reach Nagasaki following the atomic attack on that city on August 9, 1945.
The reporter was George Weller, the distinguished correspondent for the now-defunct Chicago Daily News. His startling dispatches from Nagasaki, which could have affected public opinion on the future of the bomb, never emerged from General Douglas MacArthur's censorship office in Tokyo. I wrote about this cover-up in the book I co-authored with Robert Jay Lifton in 1995, Hiroshima in America.
Carbon copiesof the stories were found in 2003 when his son discovered them after the reporter's death. Four of them were published in 2005 for the first time by the Tokyo daily Mainichi Shimbun, which purchased them from the son, Anthony Weller. I was first to report on this in the United States.
The articles published in Japan (and later included in a book assembled by Anthony Weller, First Into Nagasaki) revealed a remarkable and wrenching turn in Weller's view of the aftermath of the bombing, which anticipates the profound unease in our nuclear experience ever since. "It was remarkable to see that shifting perspective," Anthony Weller told me.
An early article that George Weller filed, on September 8, 1945—two days after he reached the city, before any other journalist—hailed the "effectiveness of the bomb as a military device," as his son describes it, and made no mention of the bomb's special, radiation-producing properties.
But later that day, after visiting two hospitals and shaken by what he saw, he described a mysterious "Disease X" that was killing people who had seemed to survive the bombing in relatively good shape. A month after the atomic inferno, they were passing away pitifully, some with legs and arms "speckled with tiny red spots in patches."
The following day he again described the atomic bomb's "peculiar disease" and reported that the leading local X-ray specialist was convinced that "these people are simply suffering" from the bomb's unknown radiation effects.
Anthony Weller, a novelist, told me that it was one of great disappointments of his father's life that these stories, "a real coup," were killed by MacArthur who, George Weller felt, "wanted all the credit for winning the war, not some scientists back in New Mexico."
Others have suggested that the real reason for the censorship was the United States did not want the world to learn about the morally troubling radiation effects for two reasons: It aimed to avoid questions raised about the use of the weapon in 1945, or its wide scale development in the coming years. In fact, an official "coverup" of much of this information—involving print accounts, photographs and film footage—continued for years, even, in some cases, decades.
"Clearly," Anthony Weller told me of his father's reports, "they would have supplied an eyewitness account at a moment when the American people badly needed one."
The Scoop That Wasn't
How did George Weller get the scoop that wasn't?
After years of covering the Pacific war, Weller (left)
arrived in Japan with the first wave of reporters and military in early
September. He had already won a Pulitzer for his reporting in 1943. Appalled by
MacArthur's censors, and "the conformists" in his profession who went along with
strict press restrictions, he made his way, with permission, to the distant
island of Kyushu to visit a former kamikaze base. But he noted that it was
connected by railroad to Nagasaki. Pretending he was "a major or colonel," as
his son put it, he slipped into the city (perhaps by boat) about three days
before any of his colleagues, and just after Wilfred Burchett had filed his
first report from Hiroshima.
Once arrived, Weller toured the city, the aid stations, the former POW camps, and wrote numerous stories within days. According to his son, he managed to send the articles to Tokyo, not by wire but by hand, and felt "that the sheer volume and importance of the stories would mean they would be respected" by MacArthur and his censors.
Although Weller did not express any outward disapproval of the use of the bomb, these stories—and others he filed in the following two weeks from the vicinity—would never see the light of the day, and the reporter lost track of his carbons. He would later summarize the experience with the censorship office in two words: "They won."
In the years that followed, Weller continued his journalism career, winning a George Polk award and other honors and covering many other conflicts. Neither the carbons nor the originals ever surfaced, before he passed away in 2002 at the age of 95. It was then that his son made a full search of the wildly disorganized "archives" at his father's home in Italy, and in 2003 found the carbons just thirty feet from his dad's desk.
And what a find: roughly seventy-five pages of stories, on fading brownish paper, that covered not only his first atomic dispatches but gripping accounts by prisoners of war, some of whom described watching the bomb go off on that fateful morning.
A 'Peculiar Weapon'
In the first article published by the Japanese paper, the first words from Weller were: "The atomic bomb may be classified as a weapon capable of being used indiscriminately, but its use in Nagasaki was selective and proper and as merciful as such a gigantic force could be expected to be." Weller described himself as "the first visitor to inspect the ruins."
He suggested about 24,000 may have died but he attributed the high numbers to "inadequate" air raid shelters and the "total failure" of the air warning system. He declared that the bomb was "a tremendous, but not a peculiar weapon," and said he spent hours in the ruins without apparent ill effects. He did note, with some regret, that a hospital and an American mission college were destroyed, but pointed out that to spare them would have also meant sparing munitions plants.
In his second story that day, however, following his hospital visits, he would describe "Disease X," and victims, who have "neither a burn or a broken limb," wasting away with "blackish" mouths and red spots, and small children who "have lost some hair."
A third piece, sent to MacArthur the following day, reported the disease "still snatching away lives here. Men, women and children with no outward marks of injury are dying daily in hospitals, some after having walked around three or four weeks thinking they have escaped.
"The doctors…candidly confessed…that the answer to the malady is beyond them." At one hospital, 200 of 343 admitted had died: "They are dead—dead of atomic bomb—and nobody knows why."
He closed this account with: "Twenty-five Americans are due to arrive September 11 to study the Nagasaki bomb site. Japanese hope they will bring a solution for Disease X." To this day, that solution for the disease—and the threat of nuclear weapons—has still not arrived.
[See my article on how Truman edited the first Hollywood movie on The Bomb, and much more here.]
Greg Mitchell is the former editor of Nuclear Times and Editor & Publisher, and co-author of Hiroshima in America and other books.
If you like this article, consider making a donation.
Reprint this article. Click here for rights and information.
Comments
So, what have we learned from the article above? Nothing! We already know that the 2nd atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, and the effects of radiation poisoning were known, photographs were taken and published, and there were some who had misgivings about using atomic weapons.
If I, as an Americam, am in some way supposed to feel guilty about the way WW2 ended, well I'm not going to fall for it. To my knowledge, to this very day, the Japanese government has never acknowledged nor apologized to the Chinese and Korean people for the atrocities the Japanese Army commited in the 1930's before the complete outbreak of WW2. Atrocities so severe, even the Nazi's were appalled.
My uncle, Yosuke Yamahata, was a photographer who arrived in Nagasaki the day
after the bomb was dropped (his photograph is the one you are using here). His
photographs and experiences are chronicled in "Nagasaki Journey."
Through his
photographs, we keep the memory of Nagasaki and its horrors from being
forgotten.
14. posted by: robert weller at 08/09/2010 @ 8:38am Report abusive | Ignore This User .BigPasture if you don't like what someone says you get out of america.
Another leftist constitutionalist supporting freedom of speech! There is nothing new under the sun. Remember those Vietnam era stickers "America love it or leave it"? You didn't leave then did you?
Maybe the myopic echo chamber leftists sites are more to your taste?
I guess there is a Peace Park in Nagasaki.
I would love to go there
sometime and I guess now I will after reading this
story.
http://web-profits.weebly.com
I had no idea that the Nagasaki was different. I have been to the peace park in Hiroshima 2 times but never been to Nagasaki. Yes I agree that this city for some reason does not have the same interest and now I am beginning to understand why.








5 comments 





